Home Blog Page 13

Why You Shouldn’t Have a List of Do’s and Dont’s for the Sabbath

In his April 2015 conference talk, “The Sabbath Is a Delight,” President Russell M. Nelson asks us to make some changes in our lives. Specifically, he asks us to think about our feelings and behavior on the Sabbath Day. President Nelson quotes the prophet Isaiah who counsels that we should “call the sabbath a delight.”

President Nelson relays a personal story in which he first recognized delight in the Sabbath and found relief from his everyday burdens including his demanding profession as a heart surgeon.

President Nelson“I first found delight in the Sabbath many years ago when, as a busy surgeon, I knew that the Sabbath became a day for personal healing. By the end of each week, my hands were sore from repeatedly scrubbing them with soap, water, and a bristle brush. I also needed a breather from the burden of a demanding profession. Sunday provided much-needed relief.

What did the Savior mean when He said that “the sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath” (Mark 2:27)? I believe He wanted us to understand that the Sabbath was His gift to us, granting real respite from the rigors of daily life and an opportunity for spiritual and physical renewal. God gave us this special day, not for amusement or daily labor but for a rest from duty, with physical and spiritual relief.”

In Hebrew the word Sabbath means “rest,” yet how do we hallow the Sabbath day? Do we need a list of dos and don’ts for the Sabbath day? President Nelson says we shouldn’t – He says that:

“when I had to make a decision whether or not an activity was appropriate for the Sabbath, I simply asked myself, “What sign do I want to give to God?” That question made my choices about the Sabbath day crystal clear.”

President Nelson reiterates that “the fulness of the earth is promised to those who keep the Sabbath day holy.” He quotes Doctrine and Covenants 59:

“That thou mayest more fully keep thyself unspotted from the world, thou shalt go to the house of prayer and offer up thy sacraments upon my holy day;

For verily this is a day appointed unto you to rest from your labors, and to pay thy devotions unto the Most High…

And on this day… let thy food be prepared with singleness of heart that thy fasting may be perfect,… that thy joy may be full… And inasmuch as ye do these things with thanksgiving, with cheerful hearts and countenances,… the fulness of the earth is yours.”

What an interesting concept, to keep the Sabbath day holy with thanksgiving and with cheerful hearts! President Nelson gives examples of strengthening family ties through quality family time, teaching the gospel to our children, studying the gospel, doing family history work, and rendering service to others.

He again quotes Isaiah 58 by stating that Isaiah, even in ancient times, taught us how to make the Sabbath a delight. The following scriptures in Isaiah are his reference:

13 If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words:

14 Then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.

President Nelson finishes his talk by stating that “not pursuing your “own pleasure” on the Sabbath requires self-discipline. You may have to deny yourself of something you might like. If you choose to delight yourself in the Lord, you will not permit yourself to treat it as any other day. Routine and recreational activities can be done some other time.

Faith in God engenders a love for the Sabbath; faith in the Sabbath engenders a love for God. A sacred Sabbath truly is a delight.”

To read his entire talk go HERE

If you missed our video series about the blessings and risks of fasting go HERE

John Bytheway and Darryl Discover 2 Nephi 8 and Isaiah 51 In the Last Days Israel Will Be Gathered and Zion Comforted

John Bytheway and Darryl take a closer look at Jacobs use of Isaiah 51 in 2 Neph 8 when the Lord promises to gather Israel and comfort Zion.

Darryl: Hi, we’re here today with John Bytheway, and we’re discussing 2 Nephi 8, which is Isaiah 51, and a couple of verses of 52. So, the thing that I liked very best was in verses 3–5, you give us some insight; a safety tip. Sign me up, sign my kids up!

John: If this is the millennial day, bring it on, it sounds great. Joy, gladness, thanksgiving, melody, then important safety tip: repent first.

Darryl: I mean there are some really nice things there and this is one of my first moments I’ve probably felt very happy in Isaiah in the Book of Mormon because it’s a lot of doom and gloom up until then. So, this thing about writing the law in your heart and you quoted 2 Corinthians 3. Can you talk to us about that at all?

John: It’s just one thing to have the Word of God in your head, but another to have it go the distance and becomes a governor for your life. And when it helps you govern your life, then it’s wonderful to have it on paper. But having it here, you carry it with you like you carry a Bible or the scriptures in your heart.

Darryl: So, it’s not on your forehead. That’s not enough?

John: That’s a symbol, but yes, we’ve got to get it inside and have it actually help us make decisions and govern us. That’s what that means.

Darryl: So, you mentioned those worms and moths again. What’s going on there?

John: Corruption and decay. I think that it is often used to show the things that are permanent and things that are temporary. And the Lord is always reminding him he’s permanent and his things are permanent, and man’s things decay and change.

Darryl: Young kids nowadays, they don’t believe in dragons. What do we do about that reference?

John: It’s a metaphor. There was a metaphorical Leviathan. I read about that, and that Rahab is sometimes a synonym for Egypt. So, he’s just saying that he’s really powerful, and I don’t know why that’s never really bothered me because I figured that they were talking about that you’re so powerful.

Darryl: Well, that’s interesting when you use the word, Leviathan. That’s actually a popular nomenclature, it goes along with zombies and some of the other things.  I think I like the word Leviathan better.

John: I think I saw it one of the commentaries I had read.

Darryl: So, what is Rahab?

John: It’s a poetic synonym for Egypt and that’s in Psalms 87: 4. And in a more general way, it’s just a representation of Satan.

Darryl: So, Egypt usually means Satan, Assyria, and Babylon. Do they have meanings too?

John: Victor Ludlow talks about Babylon kind of being like the commercial cultural center of the world. He would say to think of something like Wall Street. Assyria was like a brutal superpower that was to be feared and they would kill people and display their carcasses outside the city so that everybody else would want to be obedient.

Darryl: So, those are the three big superpowers that Isaiah refers to?

John:  Yes, I believe so.

Darryl:  And they’re good symbols for today, it sounds like.

John:  Yes.

Darryl:  I wanted to celebrate because in 2 Nephi 8:11 you said to notice the word singing, joy, holiness, gladness.

John: Yes, sorrow and mourning shall flee away. So, the redeemed of the Lord shall return. And isn’t there that theme all over the place. Scatter, gather, scatter, gather, scatter, gather. That was hard to say. I did that pretty good. But all over, they’re either scattering or gathering, it seemed to be in that process. And here again is the “remnant shall return, the redeemed will be gathered.” This is last days gathering, and it’ll be a happy event. I think missionaries are making it happen as we speak.

Darryl: So, one of the things I’ve noticed in Isaiah is that there’s always something coming from the east, and something coming from the west and it’s usually the Philistines from the west, but a wind seems pretty harmless.

John: From what I’ve read, a west wind is coming from the Mediterranean and has more moisture to it. An east wind is dry and hot and will dry out the vegetation. So, it becomes a symbol of destruction. You’re going to reap the east wind.

Darryl: That’s interesting because I have a background being in a family that had a greenhouse and we sold plants. So, some botany there. I happened to buy two today, so I noticed that the next day, they could be dead, crisp dead, if the wind blew. If the warm wind blows, it could just do it.

John:  That fast! Yes.

Darryl:  In 2 Nephi, 8:15, “whose waves roared you”, you do a footnote there and I always think it’s important for our readers to take a minute and look at the footnotes. When I taught stake institute, I usually spent a whole day trying to help people learn how to navigate what’s at the bottom of our scriptures. What I had, growing up and in college, was this thin little strip down the middle and it was not very helpful and it was very Protestant. There are lots of hours in here. Can you give us an insight into this footnote and how and why you referenced it?

John: The best commentary on the scriptures is other scriptures, and these people who wrote these footnotes, prayed over them, pored over them and it’s nice to see these connections. So, when it says, “whose waves roared, I the Lord thy God, whose waves roared, the Lord of Hosts, is my name,” takes us to footnote and it’s not me, but it’s in 1 Nephi 4:2. And interestingly, Nephi used stories from their past to motivate. So, 1 Nephi 4:2 says, “Therefore, let us go up, let us be strong like unto Moses. He truly spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided hither and thither, and our fathers came through out of captivity on dry ground, and the armies of Pharaoh did follow and were drowned in the waters of the Red Sea.” So, clearly, the scripture publications committee saw that correlation – these waves roared, Nephi is using Moses and like we looked at 2 Nephi 8:7, it really sounds like there are illusions to the ransom passing over on dry ground, to the whole Moses delivering story.

Darryl: So, I’m not into wine culture, but I think I know what a dreg is. Do you have any explanation therefor drunk on the dregs? I have made grape juice before and I know that what’s left in the bottom, is very sour, thick, chewy and full of seeds.

John: He’s endured all of it, all the way to the bottom. But, he won’t do it again, that’s the promise. It’s as if you’ve taken it all the way to the dreg.

Darryl: So, you visualize a 55-gallon wood drum and you get all this wine out. Not being a wine drinker, I am hoping it’s sweet, not sour. But, whatever’s left in the bottom, that’s what this is, right? It’s not good to the last drop.

John: It sounds bad. The reference I’ve seen to it, sounds bad. Drank it to the dregs.

Darryl: The two witnesses that are spoken of in Revelation 11:3, seems like Isaiah is touching on them here. Can you give us some insight? There’s always a lot of speculation, especially among millennials, about end days. Who are those two people going to be in Israel?

John: Bruce R. McConkie wrote in The Millennial Messiah that they could be members of the council of the 12 or first presidency, in page 390, Millennial Messiah. And in this Book of Mormon Reference Companion, which I love. It says: “Because Israel has lost the Gospel of Jesus Christ and its power to guide, direct and save, God has sent two priesthood holders to assist and bless them. These two are the same two witnesses spoken of in Revelation 11:3. They will testify in Jerusalem for three and a half years, will be killed and left dead in the streets, then will be resurrected and lifted up to meet Jesus Christ as he returns to make his appearance to this case.”

Darryl: I got called on a mission to Germany and I was really glad I didn’t get called to Israel because I always assumed that was just two elders. It’s interesting that Elder McConkie said that it might actually be apostles.

John: Yes, like apostolic witnesses is what he felt.

Darryl: Boy, to lose two of our apostles at once. I mean, if this just happened at General Conference, it would really be a hit. I thought about this in 2 Nephi 8:24, “Put on thy strength o Zion, put on thy beautiful garments.” And I thought; that can be metaphorical but even the term, for us who’ve been in doubt, do you think it has any reference at all to that?

John: I think it could. The fact is, that it’s kind of fun to see in Moroni 10:31, the very last verses of the Book of Mormon, Moroni uses this Isaiah language. It says “arise, put on thy beautiful garments, strengthen thy stakes and enlarge thy borders.” And if you look at that, in Isaiah language, like put it up, write it on a chalkboard you see the threefold mission of the church, what they used to call that. They’ve added now to take care of the poor. Can’t remember the exact words, but to “put on thy beautiful garments, redeem the dead,” that means to go to the temple. Hoyt Brewster, in his Isaiah, ‘Plain and Simple’, said perhaps this also implies the privilege of receiving sacred clothing in holy places. And when you think about the highest use of the priesthood that we have, it’s within the temple. So, there’s, “put on thy beautiful garments, redeem the dead, strengthen thy stakes, perfect the saints, enlarge thy borders, proclaim the Gospel.” You can see all of them there in the closing lines of Moroni 10:31.

Darryl: So, 2 Nephi, 8:24, it talks about the uncircumcised and uncleaned. There’s references in the Bible, when I read this I had to think about this experience for me. So, I had a Jewish neighbor, he’s LDS, but he has Jewish heritage. A time came, I finally needed to be circumcised as an adult. This is not something I recommend. That’s best done as a baby. So, when they circumcised all those guys with their rusty old swords and they all got sick and fell dead over the next few days, I went, that’s me. So, this whole thing is a token of the Abrahamic Covenant. Can you shed light on this, because these days, circumcision is common for male babies, just for health and cleanliness?

John: Yeah, it’s pretty debated too. It’s debated, and I don’t know medically the part of the debate, I could just see that means to me, that’s where I leave it alone and say that means those who haven’t made covenants will not come into Jerusalem.

Darryl: Alright. So, what this neighbor wanted to do was call the Mohel, and the Mohel performs a circumcision ritually on a baby. And I said, no, I’m going to go under anesthesia and let a doctor do this. I’ll leave that to the Mohels and to the doctors these days. So, now my favorite verse in all of Isaiah, the hilarious one, “Arise and sit down.” Now, how do you do both? Tell me about that.

John: I wondered that too. In fact, when I present this to my classes, I was like, well make up your mind, which one is it. When we remember that they were often taken slaves and maybe even with bands around their neck, dragged off to Babylon or the northern kingdom, dragged off to Assyria. I remember Ben Hur when they stopped in a village and they’re all on the ground. But this is, get up off the ground, shake yourself from the dust and sit down in dignity as on a throne so the commentaries say, and take your rightful place as Covenant Israel and that helps me make sense of it. It’s off the ground, it’s not just that you are already on a chair but get off of the ground and sit down in dignity. Paul Hoskisson says as on a throne even. So, then I think okay, it’s not contradictory, it’s, take your place rightfully.

Darryl: I don’t get to smile at it anymore, and now it has meaning, thank you.

John: You can keep it the old way if you want.

Darryl: Well, John, we appreciate you taking time with us again today. I hope you have a safe trip to Israel because that’s where you’re headed next week, right?

John: Yes, to do some more research.

Darryl: So, I understand you might see a wine press and could you bring me back some dregs, so I can see how bad they are. Right?

John: They don’t put wine in it, but there’s the carved limestone in a place called The Nazareth Jesus knew, and I can step in it and get a picture of me, if they’ll let me.

Darryl: I’d love to see your feet purple. All right, well thanks a lot and we hope you enjoy your trip.

John: Thank you.

Joseph Spencer with Ken Krogue: On the Path of Scholarship Author of "The Vision of All: Twenty-five Lectures on Isaiah in Nephi's Record

 

This is part three of a 3-part conversation with Joe Spencer

Ken Krogue completes his three-part interview with Joeseph Spencer, who explains his path to his professorship and how his book, The Vision of All plays into that.

Ken: I’ve been working fairly closely with BYU scholars now for about four or five years. And I’ve had the structure shared with me that it’s probably about 80 percent of the scholars are research-based, is that right, I think religious,  and then about 13 percent or more the teaching scholars who…they’re not under the gauntlet of publishing or perish, they’ve got to teach and then there are professionals who come into the faculty, maybe they don’t have a PhD, but they had 15, 20 years out in the workforce and those together, you know, they’re a very different mindset of those three types of people, and what sort of the mandate that you’re under, you’re on the research side.

Joseph:  I’m a research scholar.

Ken:  Describe a day in your life and what your mission is over the next year or so. What are you being asked to do?

Joseph:  To publish.

Ken:  What does that mean, because we’ve got a lot of young people saying I want to be a scholar. How would you mentor them?

Joseph:  That’s a really difficult question.  I mean I have two kinds of conversations with young people who want to become scholars.  I would say 90 percent of the cases I say run, run for your life.

Ken:  Tell me why. Why?

Joseph:  Because if they want to do it for a living, the job market is disastrous. It’s just utterly disastrous.

Ken:  It’s getting tougher and tougher all the time.

Joseph:  So, when I finished my degree, for instance, in philosophy and in my subfield of philosophy, there were seven jobs the year I graduated and 700 people in the market.

Ken:  Oh, my heavens. Is that on a national basis?

Joseph:  Yes.

Ken:  Wow.

Joseph:  Or that luck is a real thing. I mean it’s a brutal, brutal job market. So it’s like trying to make it into the NBA, right? You’ve got to compete at that level. So, if you want to be a scholar as a real paid job that this is what you do, I mean you’ve got to be the best of the best. You’ve got to be willing to compete at the highest level and what that means is publishing in very respectable venues and being able to…

Ken: How often do you need to publish?

Joseph:   It depends on where you land.

Ken:  Roughly.

Joseph:  So, in our college, the expectation is one review publication a year.

Ken:  Okay, right. That’s a real quality, forceful work project to make that happen.

Joseph:  Right.  And so, it depends,  if you land at a job at an Ivy league school, it’s gonna be higher. If you land at a place where there’s a higher emphasis on teaching than on scholarship, then it’s going to be lower. So, it varies, but that’s the expectation in religious Ed. You’ve got to be working constantly and that’s the minimal bar, right?

Ken:  This is not easy. I mean they’re all telling me the same kind of thing. That as a latter-day saint with a faith background, a God-centric background, when you publish in those journals, that doesn’t really go. You’re not allowed to go into that world so much and still get it past your peers.

Joseph:   It’s complicated. I’m less pessimistic than many maybe. I think there’s definitely a, you can call it a kind of a secular bias if you will. There’s no question, that’s the reality, but there’s space within the secular world for religion. There really is.

Ken:  Well you said some of those evangelists.

Joseph:  Especially in the field of biblical scholarship, there are many, many people working in biblical scholarship who are religious, a deeply committed. So it’s not a field that’s just filled with like angry, flag bearing seculars who are trying to get rid of God. That’s not the picture at all. When you write for that audience, you write without your faith commitments as much as possible in a certain sense, but no one’s afraid of you stating your faith commitments, as long as you make clear what they are and why they might be shaping your argument. It’s something like if you write a journal article on some drug you’re developing, you have to state up front, here are the people that funded me, so the people know the background.

Ken:  The thesis, the things that might have skewed initially.

Joseph:   Exactly. And so, in some sense, you just do this in the world of Biblical studies as well. You might say, I’m reading this as a Mormon and there’s space for that in the world of scholarship. So, you have to be careful. You have to know how to talk the right way. You have to be able to communicate well. You have to not be dogmatic about positions. You can’t come in and say everyone’s stupid because they don’t see what the restoration has revealed, you’re not going to get published.  But you can go in and say, writing as a latter-day saint, here’s how I see this.

People will give you a spot at the table. So, I’m less pessimistic about it than some people are.  Yeah. But it’s a complex field to maneuver, that’s for sure.

Ken:  Yeah, absolutely. I get a lot of feedback from a lot of directions that it’s challenging.

Joseph:  It’s challenging, but it’s not as challenging as I think it’s sometimes made to me.

The Vision of AllKen: Ok, so you’ve got a pretty cool book here. It’s called, The Vision of All, in the print version, you’ve got 25 lectures in the paperback, but in the Kindle, it’s split into two books.

Joseph:  Oh, is it?  I didn’t even know.

Ken:  Yes, half in one and one half in the other.  Pretty handy. I love it in the Kindle version. Tell us about what was the background of this.  It’s personal lectures of Isaiah in Nephi’s records.

Joseph:  That’s very specific. So the current book project I’m working on, the big Isaiah book is what led me to write this one. So, I began writing the big Isaiah book maybe five, six years ago now, began gathering data, doing research.  Some of it is not recycling but developing some of my earlier things I’ve said on Isaiah. But there was a certain point at which, in my research, I had so much floating in my head. I’d worked through every variant of Isaiah and written up… I’ve got 200 pages of notes I’ve written up on all the variants in Isaiah.  I had gone through stacks and stacks of literature on Isaiah scholarship and on theological interpretation and everything I could read by Latter-day Saints on Isaiah and I just had all this stuff in my head and I needed to get it out and organize it.

So, I began doing various projects to kind of organize this, I wrote up literature reviews and just posted them on a blog somewhere. But in order to sort of sort through all the thoughts, I had developed about what Isaiah is doing specifically in the book of Mormon, I began to think, what if I wrote a kind of popular book? And that’s how this came about, right.  So, at the time I had developed a style of writing for when I’m just going to present.

When I first began as a scholar, I was only writing for written published stuff and so even when I went to give a paper, it was a very scholarly, dry, no one knows what I’m talking about, kind of thing.  But at some point, I realized if I’m giving a paper and it’s just for presentation, there’s no reason to do that. So, I began writing and trying to figure out how to write very fluid, very chatty papers that work better in a delivery context, and so,  I felt like I had gained the right voice there. And I thought, well, what if I did something like that with all this stuff floating in my head, I could get a lot of things, kind of worked out, sort things out.

Ken:  And that’s a different approach than your first couple of books. I mean, they were to the scholarly audience. This is more of a free flow lecture format in more of a populous kind of approach.

Joseph:  No footnotes.

Ken:  Even the voices if you’re in a lecture.

Joseph:  I’ve never given these kinds of public lectures.

Ken:  Yeah, you fooled us.  We thought we were listening to a recording of some 25 great lectures.

Joseph:  That’s what I was going for. I will say I’ve had people criticize me for it. Some people are like, stop telling me we’re running out of time. I wanted it to feel like my classroom and really, what I aimed for was how do I sound when I teach in my classroom because, there my students can follow what I’m doing, where they might have a hard time reading my scholarly work. I wrote it like I was going to give the lecture in a chatty way. And nonetheless, I hope it’s nonetheless very academic. The contents are heavy and so on, but I’m trying to deliver it in this down to earth.

Ken:  Yes, more digestible. It’s doing pretty well.

Joseph:  I’m happy with it.

Ken:  Well good. Well we have been so excited to have you give us more insights into, especially into the Nephi journey concept, we just love that, and I hope it’s okay, we may come back at you and see if you’re willing to actually take us in and help us in almost a real-world workshop, study a few things and see if we can come at it that way.

Joseph:  Sure.

Ken:  Thanks for joining us today. Thanks, everybody.

Gospel Doctrine Lesson 37: Thou Hast Done Wonderful Things Supplement to the Old Testament Class Member Study Guide

For Lesson 37: ‘Thou Hast Done Wonderful Things,’ we will help each other come unto Christ by recognizing some of the wonderful things he has done.

To prepare for class prayerfully study the following scriptures:

Isaiah 22:22. The Savior opens the door to Heavenly Father’s presence. (Click here for a complete treatment of Isaiah 22) “The key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder. The key, which represents authority and power (Matt. 16:19; Rev. 3:7), opens the door to the heavenly temple. he shall open, and none shall shut/he shall shut, and none shall open. Only Christ has the power to open and close the door of the heavenly temple. The words in this phrase are repeated in Revelation 3:7.1
Isaiah 24:21–22. The Savior shows mercy for those in spirit prison. The “high ones” and the “kings of the earth” have been identified by President Joseph Fielding Smith as some of those who live in the latter days but do not keep the law, and who will therefore be shut up in the spirit prison (see DS, 2:155). Elder Theodore M. Burton also  …noting that it is not a reference to political prisoners on-the earth (see CR, Oct. 1964)2
Isaiah 25:1–432:1–2. The Savior is a strength and a refuge. One of the major messages in [Isaiah 25] is that it is worth being righteous. Those who are worthy to be with the Savior will receive the very best of blessings and enjoy the results of their righteous efforts. … the righteous praise and acknowledge the Lord for His power over the wicked. This is an important doctrine since some people are of the opinion that the forces of evil, with Satan at the helm, have a chance to ultimately triumph over the Savior. They don’t.
[In chapter 32] Isaiah prophesies that the day will come when Jesus Christ will rule and reign, but in the meantime until the restoration of the gospel and the gathering of Israel, the land of Israel will be a wilderness.3
Isaiah 25:6–9. The Savior will prepare a feast and destroy the “vail.” The “feast of fat things” is the gospel feast, when the righteous will partake of more of the mysteries of godliness. This is the great supper of the Lord in Mount Zion, the New Jerusalem (compare D&C 58:8–12). All are invited, but only those who are clean and properly dressed will be allowed to stay and sup (JST Matthew 22:14).
Isaiah 25:8. The Savior wipes away our tears. Tears come from the pain and sorrow associated with mortality, affliction, pain, death, and personal sin. When he dwells with us after his coming, Jesus Christ, who is well acquainted with grief (53:3), will remove the pains of our mortality (Rev. 7:17; 21:4; D&C 101:29).
Isaiah 26:19. The Savior will bring the Resurrection. Elder B. H. Roberts, in correspondence with a Jewish rabbi, used this verse as evidence of the Messiah’s being Jesus Christ, noting that his resurrection was foretold in the Old Testament (see Rasha the Jew, pp. 48-49).
Isaiah 28:16. The Savior is our sure foundation. This is a prophecy of Jesus Christ, in which he is called a stone, a tried stone (or a stone tested for strength), and a precious cornerstone. A cornerstone adds permanence and strength to the foundation of a building. Here the building is the latter-day Zion, and “he that believeth” may have a “sure foundation” on which to build (1 Pet. 2:6–8).
Peter’s quotation of Isaiah here reads, “He that believeth on him shall not be confounded” (1 Pet. 2:6), and Paul’s quotation reads, “shall not be ashamed” (Rom. 9:33; 10:11). The meaning of this phrase, then, is: “Whosoever believes on him [Christ, the stone] shall not be [confounded or] ashamed.” 
Isaiah 29:4, 9–14, 18, 24. The Savior will restore the gospel to the earth. Isaiah 29 and 2 Nephi 27; the Marvelous Work and a WonderIsaiah 29 (2 Nephi 25, 26, 27) a Marvelous Work and a Wonder
Isaiah 30:19–21. The Savior knows our trials and directs our paths. These verses are the message of hope which Isaiah holds out for the time when Jerusalem shall become a Zion society, when the Lord will hear Israel’s prayers and answer them. The Jewish Publication Society Translation capitalizes and singularizes the word “Teacher” in verse 20, showing that they consider the verse to be a messianic prophecy of the time following their affliction among the nations, when they shall see the Messiah among them. But verse 21 shows that the Holy Ghost will also be their guide.
Elder Thomas S. Monson cited this verse as a reference to the “still, small voice which testifies of truth” (CR, Apr. 1975, p. 23). Elder Marion D. Hanks said this verse provided an example of the right voice to follow among the world’s many existing voices (see CR, Oct. 1965, p. 120) 
  • Isaiah told of people drawing near to the Lord with their mouths while their hearts are far from Him (Isaiah 29:13). How can we make sure that we are close to the Lord in our thoughts and actions as well as in our words?

Footnotes

1 Parry, Donald W., Understanding Isaiah, Deseret Book Company
Nyman, Monte S., Great are the Words of Isaiah, Deseret Book Company

3  Ridges, David J., The Old Testament Made Easier Part 3, Cedar Fort, Inc., Kindle Edition
Ogden, D. Kelly. Verse by Verse, Old Testament: Volume Two, Deseret Book Company. Kindle Edition
5 Parry, ibid.
Nyman, ibid
7 Parry, ibid.
Nyman, ibid

The Suffering Servant: Part IV "Who shall declare his generation?"

The Suffering Servant: Part II
Find other posts in this series by clicking here

In the fourth article in the series on the Suffering Servant, we go with our Divine Redeemer as He, who was perfectly pure, takes upon Himself my sins and yours.

“All we, like sheep, have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquityies of us all.” Isaiah 53:6

“All we, like sheep, have gone astray.” The Targum (????) has, “All we like sheep have been scattered.” The LXX (????) reads, “We all like sheep had strayed.”

Alexander explains: “The original expression is like the sheep (or collectively the flock) i.e. not sheep in general, but the sheep that wander, or that have no shepherd.—The idea of a shepherd, although not expressed, appears to have been present to the writer’s mind, not only in the first clause but the last, where the image meant to be presented is no doubt that of a shepherd laying down his life for the sheep. This may be fairly inferred not merely from the want of connection which would otherwise exist between the clauses, and which can only be supplied in this way, nor even from the striking analogy of Zechariah 13:7, where the figure is again used, but chiefly from the application of the metaphor, with obvious, though tacit, reference to this part of Isaiah, in the New Testament to Christ’s laying down his life for his people (see John 10:11–18, and 1 Peter 2:24–25).

“The figure of wandering, or lost sheep is common in Scripture to denote alienation from God and the misery which is its necessary consequence (see Ezekiel 34:5; Matthew 9:36) … a comparison with scattered sheep, whose running off in different directions [springs] from confusion, ignorance, and incapacity to choose the right path … [Theodoret] understands it to denote the vast variety of false religions …” “We have turned every one to his own way.”

Elder Charles W. Penrose taught, “That is what is the matter with the Christian world. They are not walking in the Lord’s way. They are walking in the ways that men have invented. Any student of the Scriptures who is willing to receive truth when it is presented before him can see by perusing the sacred books of the Old and the New Testaments, that the condition of the world at the present time was anticipated by the ancient prophets and apostles. They all saw that the time would come when the people would turn away from the truth; when they would walk in their own ways; when they would build up churches to themselves; when they would hire men to preach to them things which were wise and good in their own eyes; they would not be very anxious to find out the will of God, or that He might declare it to them, but would have preachers to teach them doctrines which seemed good to their ‘itching ears.’”[1]

President Brigham Young shared: “Before I heard the gospel I searched diligently to know and understand whatever could be learned among the sectarians respecting God and the plan of salvation. It was so with the majority of the Latter-day Saints. But very little can be learned among Christian professors; they are ignorant about God and His kingdom, and the design He had in view in the formation of the earth and peppering it with His creatures… My brother Joseph [i.e., Joseph Young who also joined the Church] once said to me (and we were both Methodists at the time), ‘Brother Brigham, there is not a Bible Christian in the world; what will become of the people?’ For many years no person saw a smile on his countenance, in consequence of the burden of the Lord being upon him, and realizing that the inhabitants of the earth had all gone out of the way and had turned every man to his own views. I am … speaking now of … their ignorance of the gospel of the Son of God and of the way to be saved in the celestial kingdom of our Father.”[2]

And the Lord hath laid on him the iniquities of us all.” The Targum (????) says, “It pleased the Lord (literally, ‘it shall be the pleasure of the Lord’) to forgive the sins of all of us for His sake.” Instead of iniquity, the Peshitta (????) has sins.

The principle of Divine Investiture is found here. Even some of the Gentile authors, such as Birks, recognize this: “The question. Who speaks in this chapter? has received various answers … The view which alone explains the whole, without requiring any abrupt change of person, is that it is ‘the Spirit of Christ, which was in’ the prophet, who here speaks by his lips.”

Keith says: “The marginal and literal meaning of the last clause, ‘The Lord caused the iniquity of us all to meet on him,’ is more expressive. It appears to refer to the act of the elders of Israel laying their hands on the head of the sacrifice, which was symbolical of the transference to it of the guilt of the people. It all met on the head of the victim.” Wordsworth has: “As the Apostle says, ‘He made Him to be sin for us. Who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him’ (2 Corinthians 5:21). And again, ‘Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us’ (Galatians 3:13); ‘He was once offered to bear the sins of many’ (Hebrews 9:28).”

“He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.” Isaiah 53:7

“He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth.” The Targum (????) says, “He shall pray and He shall be answered, yea, before He shall open His mouth, He shall be heard.”[3] The Douay-Rheims (????) says, “He was offered because it was his own will, and he opened not his mouth.” We have, for instance, associated with our Savior’s conviction: “And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing. Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee? And he answered him to never a word; insomuch that the governor marvelled greatly” (Matthew 27:12–14). Jenour, of these verses, has: “Can anything correspond more exactly than the history and the prophecy in this case?” Schiller-Szinessy, leaning on the Targum (????) explain that all Christ could have opened His mouth and asked to be rescued and it would have been immediately done: “Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?” (Matthew 26:53). Then, all would have been lost.

Elder Erastus Snow taught: “[Christ] waged war constantly, and was well prepared for this work, having an inexhaustible source of strength to draw from, the Spirit having been given to him without measure. But at length, the time came when the Father said, You must succumb, you must be made the offering. And at this dark hour the power of the Father withdrew itself measurably from him, and he was left to be taken by his enemies, and, like a lamb, was led to the slaughter, but he opened not his mouth because his hour had come. And when he was led to exclaim in his last agony upon the cross, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? [t]he Father did not deign to answer; the time had not yet come to explain it and tell him.

“But after a little, when he passed the ordeal, made the sacrifice, and by the power of God was raised from the dead, then all was clear, all was explained and comprehended fully. It was necessary that the Father should thus measurably forsake his Son …”[4] On this topic, see Elder Jeffrey R. Holland’s most moving talk, None were with Him (April 2009 General Conference). “He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter.”

Birks has: “Messiah was the Lamb, whom God provided for a spotless offering (Genesis 22:8).” Govett points us to “The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: In his humiliation, his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth. And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus” (Acts 8:32–35).

Govett testifies: “It is therefore evidently implied in the strongest manner that Jesus is the subject of this passage.”

Urwick suggests: “The prophet’s comparison is to the sacrifice of the paschal lamb, and he says: ‘As the lamb to the slaughter He is brought’” (emphasis added on paschal lamb). Urwick reminds us that the word for sheep or ewe is also used for Jacob’s wife, Rachel, רָחֵל. “And as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.”

Govett also quotes Christ’s comment: “Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?” (Matthew 6:23), as well as His refusal to answer the accusations of the High Priest (see Matthew 27:12; Mark 15:3) and of Pilate: “Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee? And he answered him to never a word; insomuch that the governor marvelled greatly” (Matthew 27:13–14).

“He was taken from prison and from judgment; and who shall declare his generation? For he was cut off out of the land of the living; for the transgression of my people was he stricken.” Isaiah 53:8

“He was taken from prison and from judgment.” Schiller-Szinessy explains that Christ was taken “without rule and without justice.” The prophet Abinadi, in the Book of Mormon, taught: “I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people … And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people. And after all this, after working many mighty miracles among the children of men, he shall be led, yea, even as Isaiah said, as a sheep before the shearer is dumb, so he opened not his mouth. Yea, even so he shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father.

“And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men—Having ascended into heaven, having the bowels of mercy; being filled with compassion towards the children of men; standing betwixt them and justice; having broken the bands of death, taken upon himself their iniquity and their transgressions, having redeemed them, and satisfied the demands of justice” (Mosiah 15:1a, 5–9). McFadyen, leaning on Marti, suggests the Servant, “debarred from justice was taken away to death.” Cheyne has: “He was taken away] i.e., by a violent death.”

And who shall declare his generation?” Alexander notes: “Kimhi and Hengstenberg explain it to mean, who can declare his posterity or spiritual seed?” See also Abinadi in Mosiah 15:10–14 and 15 ff., so that the declaring of this generation is intimately related to both the seed of Christ as well as the preaching of the Gospel. Elder Bruce R. McConkie instead taught: “Who shall declare his generation?] This means, ‘Who will give his genesis? Who will reveal his genealogy? Who will give the source from whence he sprang? Who will announce the divinity of the mortal Messiah?’”[5] “For he was cut off out of the land of the living.” Keith has: “By the expression ‘cut off,’ is implied the violence of his death.” In Isaiah 38:12 we will speak of, “I have cut off like a weaver my life.” While the Hebrew here is different, the idea is the same. It was the ultimate sacrifice. Cheyne says: “He drank his cup to the dregs.” “For the transgression of my people was he stricken.” The LXX (????) reads, “For the transgressions of my people he is led to death.” Whitehouse complaints about the use of עַמִּי, my people, here. Multiple exegetes wish to replace my people with peoples. While Cheyne thinks the change is possible he well notes: “Four places, it is true, are mentioned in the Massora in which the proposed substitution is possible, but this passage is not one of them.”

Although Christ died for both Jew and Gentile, we read a special pathos into the scene, as in Zechariah 12:10: “And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.”

So also: “And one shall say unto him, What are these wounds in thine hands? Then he shall answer, Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends [i.e., my people]” (Zechariah 13:6). Returning to the LXX (????), see above, Lowth suggests that in the Hebrew we are missing to death למות, based on an interesting conversation between Origen and the Jewish scholars of his time, according to a note by Kennicott (see Lowth for the details).

“And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence evil, neither [was any] deceit in his mouth.” Isaiah 53:9

“And he made his grave with the wicked.” Birks has: “Our Lord was buried among malefactors, a class, but with the rich man [Joseph of Arimathea[6]], a single person, by the appointment of the judges who condemned Him, in minute agreement with the prophecy.”

Alexander further comments: “Malefactors were either left unburied, or disgraced by a promiscuous[7] interment in an unclean place; a usage explicitly asserted by Josephus and Maimonides. As the Messiah was to die like a criminal, he might have expected to be buried like one; and his exemption from this posthumous dishonour was occasioned by a special providential interference.”

When I visited Jerusalem, I was sure I would weep at the Western Wall. Instead, I was surprised because I almost felt as if the Spirit of the Lord was saying: “I am no longer here. I have moved my Presence from what used to be the site of the Holy Temple.” On a different day, about a week later, we visited what is called the Garden Tomb. It was there that I was overcome by the Spirit, which seemed to proclaim: “Why seek ye the living among the dead?” (Luke 24:5) for “I am risen” (Matthew 26:32b).

That day, in my Scripture journal I wrote: “I read John 20:1–18 here, today Friday, 7 September 2012, to Linda, just a few meters from the tomb of Christ, at the Garden Tomb site. Indeed, ‘He is risen.’ I was overcome by the Spirit. —7 Sep 2012.” Through much of our trip our tour guide had been sending innuendos about the falseness of Christianity. I was sharing these scriptures on the bus with a few people in the front seats, when they asked I share them with all, which I did gladly. “Because he had done no evil. Instead of violence” (see KJV), the LXX (????), Peshitta (????) and Douay-Rheims (????) use a synonym to evil (as in the Book of Mormon), iniquity. Delitzsch also follows close to the Book of Mormon: “… because He had done no wrong.”

Indeed, one of the acceptations for the Hebrew חָמָס is wrong (Gesenius). TDOT has “It is already apparent here that all חָמָס is ultimately directed against Yahweh.” Urwick explains: “It [חָמָס] signifies active violation of the law. TDOT further has, “In Ezekiel 28:16, “be filled with חָמָס” is synonymous with “sin.” In other words, our Redeemer was free from any sort of iniquity, wrong or sin—thus permitting Him to expiate for ours. “Neither was any deceit in his mouth.” The Targum (????) has, “And that they should not speak folly (other copies read נִכְלִין, ‘guile’) with their mouth.” The LXX (????) reads, “Nor practised guile with his mouth.” The Savior spoke only that which His Father had Him say.

Notes

[1] Penrose, Elder Charles W., Sincerity Alone Not Sufficient, Etc. Journal of Discourses 25:44b, 20 May 1883.

[2] Young, President Brigham. “Condition of Apostates, Etc.” Journal of Discourses 12:95. [3] Allusion to Isaiah 65:24.

[4] Snow, Elder Erastus, “Rest Signifies Change, Etc.” Journal of Discourses 21:26a. October 1879.

[5] McConkie, Elder Bruce R. “Who Shall Declare His Generation?” BYU Studies, vol. 16 (1975–1976), Number 4 – Summer 1976, p.554.

[6] Matthew 27:57–60.

[7] Here, indiscriminate as to the class of people.

Old Testament 2018 Teaching Plans for Gospel Doctrine—Lesson 36 Darryl models "Come, Follow Me" lesson plan for Isaiah

5 Lesson Plans CoverDOWNLOAD five lesson plans NOW!

 

DOWNLOAD Old Testament 2018 Teaching Plans for Gospel Doctrine
Lessons 36–40 where Darryl models "Come, Follow Me" lesson plans.

Lesson 36:
“The glory of Zion will be a defense” 

Now we’re going to make an assumption here— I’m going to get up to the whiteboard for just a minute. Imagine that during the week, if I was using the  Come, Follow Me format, I would have sent you notes to read Isaiah 1–6, to read these sections in the Doctrine and Covenants 45:32; 87:8; 101:22  and to read 2 Nephi 11, for personal study to be ready for Sunday school today.

I would have also prompted you to watch this video: Following Prophetic Counsel (Isaiah 1-12) and read these talks

Since making this video we have added additional scriptures, talks, and videos:

Other Scriptures:

Other Talks:

Rise to Your Call, Henry B. Eyring, Oct 2002
Stand Ye in Holy Places, David L Beck and Elaine S. Dalton

Other Videos:
Rise to your Call, President Henry B. Eyring
Stand Strong in Holy Places, Elder Robert D. Hales, 6 Apr 13
Following Prophetic Counsel (Isaiah 1-12) Elder Ballard
2018 Worldwide Devotional for Youth, Pres. Nelson, Jun 18
Perilous Times, (Isaiah 24) President Gordon B Hinckley

These could all be integrated into what we’re covering today. As you can see on the screen that’s kind of your preparation where I reminded you a minute ago, you should pray and study. These would be the things that you’re reading, but if you can get your students to read them, good things will happen in the classroom.

In the youth curriculum, the instructors are supposed to connect with the seminary teacher, with the parents, with the young men or young women’s leaders, to see what they’re teaching and what dynamics are happening in the classroom. This is probably pretty challenging, but if you live in a place in the world where texting is common or if there’s email, it should be still easy to connect to members of your ward. Let them see progressively during the week the discoveries you’re making in this study.

Now, remember the thing about Isaiah that is challenging, is that we have just moved from historical chapters like Chronicles and Kings where we were looking at stories. Not so much so with Isaiah, this is going to be a little bit different.

One of the things that you need to be able to do is find your own conference talks. I selected two today as I showed you on the whiteboard, but you need to go to General Conference> Speakers> Topics as shown here:

Then you can just scroll down through or you can search a topic.

I searched ‘Stand Ye in Holy Places’ and found the talk from President Monson and the one on serving. I just typed in the word ‘serve’ and found and it replicates Isaiah experience, so that’s pretty useful.

Also, you should try and get familiar with the Old Testament video library that the church has prepared:

Lessons don’t always include those videos for you, so you may not have time to do them in class, but there’s an excellent video from Elder Ballard with this lesson that talks about Isaiah, 1 through 12, and I don’t think you should miss that out.

So, as you can see here on the screen, videos listed by scripture. This is the Old Testament videos, LDS media library, and you just need to go to that last section, search Isaiah through Malachi and check to see if there are scriptures related to what you’re teaching the rest of the year.

I’m going to remind you again as we sort of end this summary, the key is to connect with your students regularly, not just on Sunday. So, you might write people Tuesday morning, ask them to tell you about something they did at family home evening or that they are finding challenging in their family, that you could work into your lessons. 

The idea is we’re not so interested in knowing everything that happens in these first 6 chapters in Isaiah, but we’re very interested in trying to make things very relevant in the classroom discussion.

I’m going to remind you once again, now that I’m moving into the actual lesson, you’re going to want to download the pre-formatted lesson plan. It’s just waiting there if you’ll click.


One of the things that Teaching, No Greater Call (p. 164) suggests is that we start with an object lesson. And I have to tell you I was charmed by this one.

Sunday School Object Lesson

So, my wife always liked Whitman’s Samplers; a little, teeny Whitman’s Sampler has 4 chocolates in it. She grew up in a family of 8, six of them were girls. So that’s what their dad would buy them, as kind of as a little token gift. My problem with the way most of us in the church approach Isaiah is that that’s about the most we’ll do, is take a sampler.

We recently conducted a survey at SearchIsaiah, where we asked people if they skip, skim or read Isaiah. Two-thirds of the church responded that that’s what they did, but not study Isaiah.

Christ has commanded us to study Isaiah diligently; let me just show you what you’re really missing. Having a Whitman’s Sampler is fine, but the idea here is if you take all of Isaiah, you get all of this, plus another layer underneath. There are treats waiting for you galore in Isaiah if you’ll really search it diligently.

Sunday School Lesson Introduction

A couple of background things before we jump in and I think this is important in each of your classes, before you break into the group discussions, try to give people some background. I want you to know that the book of Isaiah is not chronological, it’s kind of like teachings of the prophets that we’ve been studying the last few years in relief society and priesthood, sort of a collection of talks or thoughts.

That presents some challenges for some people because it seems odd that things present that way. For example, when we read chapter 6 today, Isaiah receives his call and you start asking yourself, well, why isn’t that in chapter 1? Well, section 1 of the Doctrine and Covenants wasn’t given first, it was given later. So, it’s that same kind of thing.

Also, in the background, Isaiah served during the reign of four kings:

The first king was okay, the next was bad—evil, then a king that was righteous and good, and then a king that was very bad. Bad enough, according to tradition, to put Isaiah in a log and saw him in half and that was the end of Isaiah.

Isaiah served longer than most other prophets did, and he served in the king’s court. There were other contemporary prophets like Micah and other prophets around the country also teaching and preaching. He served in a time of war and fear.

The twelve tribes were not a unified nation anymore. The northern tribes, known as Israel, were being threatened and eventually taken captive by Assyria.

So, let’s take a little step back and get a feel for what we’ve covered. The first 1000 years in the Old Testament that we’ve been talking about over the last few months, we’ve talked about the creation and Adam and Eve and raising their children. And we’ve talked about Noah and the flood. And then we moved to the Patriarchs with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph, and the Israelites all being led into Egypt then being let out, and how Joshua brought them back into Israel. And how judges had now ruled for 500 or 600 years. And these were great times.

But the Israelites wanted kings and so contrary to what the Lord asked, Samuel and Saul and David and Solomon all became kings. This is the period in Israel’s time of the golden age, when the temple was built and where a great deal of wealth and commerce came into being. In fact, it was during Solomon’s reign that instead of land and food or grain, wealth was measured by money. So that was a big change.

Then the kingdom split, one of Solomon sons, Rehoboam served as the king of Judah, and that was primarily the tribe of Judah, Benjamin and there were Levites and a few others. And then the king of Israel was a servant of Solomon, Jeroboam, Then another series of their kings came quickly in the northern kingdom. Within about a 200-year period, they were decimated as a country and lead northward into Assyria and assimilated. We know them as the lost ten tribes.

Isaiah served during king Uzziah, Ahaz, Hezekiah and Manasseh’s periods, almost 40 years, it’s a really long term of service. All during this period, as you can see here on the map, Assyria was coming further and further south until they eventually were at the gates of Jerusalem as depicted.

Assyria was a brutal nation and just a world power. So, when Isaiah talks about Assyria, he’s talking about that kind of power, later he talks about Babylon, that’s more about economic wealth.

Those are some good insights in the background.

I’d like to remind you once again that the lesson outline can be a little confusing at this point because we’re breaking into discussion groups. I’m going to model three kinds for you, so you ought to download the lesson plan. It’s available right here if you’ll just click it.

Sunday School Classroom Discussions

Obviously, an easy way to get six discussion groups is using the six chapters in Isaiah. Victor Ludlow recommended that a way to get into Isaiah’s chapters pretty simply is to read the chapter headings. So, if you divided your group up that way and gave them the scripture assignments and you let them discuss one chapter each and maybe do the comparative chapters in 2 Nephi, (2 Nephi from chapter 12 forward will cover these same 6 chapters).

 

Only chapter 1 won’t have a parallel chapter in the Book of Mormon, but there’s plenty of chapter 1 for discussion. So, let me just read you one heading so you have an idea. This is chapter 1:

“The people of Israel are apostate, rebellious, and corrupt; only a few remain faithful—The people’s sacrifices and feasts are rejected—They are called upon to repent and work righteousness—Zion will be redeemed in the day of restoration.”

In this chapter, this is Isaiah 1, but we’re just looking at that little chapter heading. In this particular chapter, Isaiah starts to introduce us already to some very powerful images he uses. He talks about ‘crimson and scarlet.’ And he talks about ‘snow and white as wool.’

Those contrasts help us begin to explore the atonement which is a major theme of Isaiah if you really take time to ponder and study it.

The second way we could divide up is into study groups. This based on the actual lesson as you can see here we have five study groups, each with a series of scriptures to read and a conference talk.

  1. Stand ye in holy places, and be not moved.”
3. Isaiah describes the condition of the world in the last days.

2. Isaiah describes the condition of the world in the last days.

4. The gathering of Israel in the latter days.

  • Isaiah 5:26–29
  • Worldwide Devotional for Youth: Messages from President Russell M. Nelson

5. Isaiah responded willingly to his call to be a prophet.

Give your class members maybe 10 minutes, 15 if you can afford it, to talk these through after you’ve done a quick orientation.

In that orientation that I did at the beginning only took 10 minutes. So, in your class period, if you have 30 minutes left, give them 15 minutes of study time. Then let them report.

Stand Ye in Holy Places is one of the topics. Isaiah describing the condition of the world in the last days. I split that into two parts because there were so many verses. And then the gathering of Israel and the focus on a President Nelson’s worldwide devotional. And then Isaiah’s willingness to accept his call to be a prophet after he accepted the atonement.

This particular lesson has an unusually good service for us in the section called the additional teaching, which you can see her on the screen. There are 6 topics, making our religious observances acceptable to the Lord. It’s a great and relevant discussion for your classroom. The blessings of forgiveness, avoiding worldliness and appearance and calling evil good, and good evil, being wise in our own eyes and understanding his hand stretched out still, which could be a hand reaching to us or a hand ready to slap us for being bad.

Sunday School Lesson Conclusion

At this point in the lesson, I want to introduce you to a Search Isaiah tool called a Search Hack. And this is Hack #1, I’m going to play it for you right now:

This lesson features Search Hack 1. Show it to your class using Facebook, to avoid LDS Church firewalls that block Youtube

“The book of Isaiah in the Old Testament is purposefully difficult to read because of the many powerful truths and prophecies it contains, but that’s exactly why we are commanded to search it.

“In 3 Nephi 23: 1, the resurrected Christ is visiting the Nephites in the Americas. He says, ‘A commandment I give unto you that you search these things diligently for great are the words of Isaiah.’

“Isaiah is the only scripture, Christ himself tells us to search. And Jesus wasn’t the only one, Nephi, Jacob and Abinadi collectively quote 19 full chapters of Isaiah plus other select passages.

“You can download this study bookmarked pdf in the description that shows where these sections of the Book of Mormon are. Then in your library app, use the tag tool writing Isaiah in the tag then make the tag brown to denote the passages quoting Isaiah, whether it’s a full chapter or a verse.

“Isaiah is also quoted up to 70 times in the New Testament and 5 times in the April 2018 General Conference.

“As you study Isaiah, ask yourself, how can we apply Isaiah to things happening in our day? You decide.”

I hope you enjoyed that search hack and summary. There are 5 of these hacks, 1 for each lesson. We hope they’ll help you learn to use the Gospel App a little better.

This particular one introduces us to Isaiah as the most quoted prophet. He’s the most quoted in the Book of Mormon, most quoted in the New Testament by Jesus, and he’s quoted a great deal by our own general authorities. 

Sunday School Home Study

It also covered the command where Jesus commanded us to search diligently, not to try the Whitman’s Sampler, but to get in the whole box and dive deep. We also introduced you to a tool in the gospel library app called the tag tool. We’re going to show you how to mark your scriptures over the next few weeks in your gospel library because so many of you are using handheld devices.

Also, to help you with your diligent study, I’ll give you links and direct you to SearchIsaiah.org, Discover with Darryl.

As you can see here in the first column I give you the King James version, the comparison with the Book of Mormon and a piece of commentary, and that’s going to help you a little bit.

I’m going to remind you now, what Jesus said about searching diligently in 3 Nephi. He said, “great are the words of Isaiah” and it’s the only place that we’re commanded to read another prophet’s scripture. Jesus obviously believes in what Isaiah had to say. He quoted him extensively in his appearance among the Nephites and then commanded us all to study diligently.

I testify the words of Isaiah teach us things about the latter-days. Studying his counsel, we learn to stand in holy places and avoid the evils of the world.  By following his example, we will be more willing servants of our Father in heaven.


I remind you once again, if you’re a Sunday school instructor, you can download this lesson and get all 5 Isaiah lesson plan and slides in a Come, Follow Me format for Gospel Doctrine Lessons 36-40 by clicking this link.

Teaching a Sunday School class? Worried about the “Come Follow Me” next year.  Isaiah Lessons (Lessons 36-40)? Don’t miss this opportunity to teach something valuable, with these full lesson plans.

Darryl teaches us using the Come Follow Me method, while showing how to use these downloaded lesson plans in your classroom. Use it this Sunday for an easy effective Isaiah lesson.

Gospel Doctrine Lesson 36: The Glory of Zion Will Be a Defense Supplement to the Old Testament Class Member Study Guide

It is lucky for us Latter-day Saints that every other year we get to study chapters from Isaiah in the Old Testament and in the Book of Mormon.

But taking on all 66 chapters may be a bit too much. Our team hopes that what we have done here will help to organize into your personal study plan to at least support your study of the  Gospel Doctrine Old Testament Lessons 36–40, which are the Isaiah chapters we will study this year.

For most of us, that study will begin in mid-September. To get you ready to be a rock star class member below is a five-week calendar; using this plan during the weeks that your ward is reading Isaiah in Sunday School should help your understanding of this great prophet’s message, which is actually another witness of Christ.


 Lesson 36: The Glory of Zion Will Be a Defense
Old Testament Class Member Study Guide

Isaiah Chapter 1

Isaiah Chapter 1

The wicked and rebellious shall be punished for their iniquities, for social injustice, and neglect of true temple worship, but Israel may be cleansed through the Atonement.

San Diego lDS temple

Isaiah Chapter 2 / 2 Nephi 12

The Lord’s house will be built in the top of the mountains in the last days. There all nations will receive instruction and be judged by the Lord. During the millennium there will be no war, but the day coming where God will humble all the proud and mighty. Israel is commanded to stop relying on man and to rely on God.

6 Day War Tanks Isaiah Chapter 3 / 2 Nephi13
Judah will fall. Men of skill and leadership will be taken away, leaving the inexperienced to rule. Israel provoked God and oppressed each other. The daughters of Zion (in a metaphor for the people of Judah and all covenant Israel) are obsessed with fashion and appearance to attract other lovers (not their God), but they will be humbled as slaves, their men will die in war.
Lord's vineyard, which "is the only parable found in Isaiah's writings."1 Personally, I've spent plenty of time with the parables of the olive garden
Tree Pruned - the oak and the teil-tree, can have all their leaves eaten off, can even be chopped down, but will regenerate because the sap or substance is still within to help them regrow

Isaiah prophesied much about the Savior’s earthly mission, about Israel’s destruction due to wickedness, and about the destiny (mission) of Israel in the last days.

  • Isaiah’s warnings and prophecies were not just to ancient Israel, but to our time too. As you read Isaiah 1–5, note what conditions in the past seem evident in the world today?
  • There are three holy places mentioned in Isaiah 4:5–6; what are they and how do they offer safety from evil?

Additional reading: 2 Nephi 11.

John Bytheway Discovers 2 Nephi 7 and Isaiah 50 with Darryl Symbols in Isaiah's Third Servant Song

Join John Bytheway and Darryl Alder as they discuss Johns presentation of Isaiah 50 from Isaiah for Airheads and explore symbolism and meaning in Isaiah’s Third Servant Song:

Darryl: Hi, we’re here today with John Bytheway. We’re talking about 2nd Nephi, chapter 7, which is also Isaiah, chapter 50. And in ‘Isaiah for Airheads‘, you start right out and say, Jacob taught these words according to 2 Nephi 7:8, to the people of Nephi, as recorded in his word, 2 Nephi 6:1. So in my recent studies, I came across a scholar who says that Jacob might not be teaching his relatives. So, tell me a little about the chapter and give me any insight you can think of where that would make sense.

John: The Book of Mormon says it was written to the Lamanites in the very beginning, but then it says liken it to all of you. And so, I don’t know, sometimes could it be both. Like Isaiah’s dualistic, maybe he’s talking to both, but I can see where he might be going.

Darryl: But, if we look at the title page, it doesn’t just say the Lamanites, it also says to the Jew and the Gentile. So, there’s kind of an order there. And I wonder Nephi’s probably tied more to the Jew from his tradition, having grown up in Jerusalem. But Jacob’s the young kid born in the wilderness, and who knows how old they are. I like to imagine that this particular set of chapters and readings happened at a general conference where Nephi has assigned Jacob to talk because he says he is. And Jacob gives some commentary about what his brother just said in Isaiah 48 and 49, which was 1 Nephi 20 and 21. Any insights you have into what’s going on between the two of them, other than there might be 20 years difference in their age?

John:  Yeah, I think I can see where Jacob might be looking; more to the future. It says in 2 Nephi 6:12:

“Blessed are the Gentiles, they of whom the prophet has written; for behold, if it so be that they shall repent and fight not against Zion, and do not unite themselves to that great and abominable church, they shall be saved.”

And this is the thing; the Book of Mormon we’re always told it is written for us. So, was he talking to them, was he talking to us? And the answer is probably yes, a little bit of both, don’t you think? And maybe in the same way that Isaiah can be dualistic, and as far as having multiple meanings and maybe this is the same thing here, because I’ve often thought it sounds, boy, like he’s really talking to them saying we are still house of Israel, but that’s a good message for us too.

Darryl: I wonder if Jacob by this point, has seen Christ. He says that somewhere soon, in the Book of Mormon, I’m trying to remember where, no Nephi says, “My brother and I have seen Christ.” And so, it’s Isaiah. So, that makes all three of them, witnesses of Christ. That really makes the Book of Mormon another testament for Christ for sure. That’s kind of cool.

Symbolism in the Third Servant Song

There’s a lot of symbolism in here and you’d highlighted a couple, I thought that our readers might be interested in – the hand and the arm of the Lord. What does that mean?

John: It symbolizes his power. And an extended hand is different than a shortened hand. So, have I shortened my hand, am I not involved anymore or am I involved? So, his arm is revealed, then we can all tell, whoa, the Lord’s involved in this.

John Bytheway Discovers 2 Nephi 7 and Isaiah 50 with Darryl
The brother of Jared sees the Lord’s finger

Darryl: When you just did that, it made me think of Mahonri Moriancumer (the brother of Jared) when he reached out his arm and saw the finger of the Lord.

John: Yeah, you saw my fingers.

Darryl: Oh wow.

John: So that’s what I’ve always thought, and sometimes we’ll get, his hand is stretched out still, and I’ve even read that sometimes it’s a hand to strike and another to embrace. And we see kind of the arm of justice, the arm of mercy, we might say. We see both of them.

Darryl: So, this next one has to do with the word flint in verse 7, “I set my face like flint.” Now I’m a boy scout from a long time and flint is a really hard rock and when I strike steel against it, it actually shaves off a piece of the steel and makes a spark. So, talk to us about what that means there – “I set my face like a flint”?

John: Well, I’m no flint expert, but it sounds like it’s a hard stone. And when he set his face like flint, I get this sense of determination and resolve that I’m going to do the will of the Father here, and we get that in the New Testament. In the book of John, every chapter in the book of John mentions the Father except for John chapter 21. And he’s always telling us, I’m here to do the will of the Father, I’m going to take you to the Father and that determination, that’s what the flint reminds me of a really hard set.

Darryl: Yes. It’s interesting because flint’s usually black or grey. Think about that also on your face, just as you did that face to me, that is a flint-like face, for sure. I’m not going to be your kid if you have a flint face.  So, in verses 5 through 7 where it talks about “I gave my back to this smiter.” You amplified things that were interesting. “I” gave my back, and I thought that was interesting, but there’s something in here about plucking hair off the cheeks. Can you find that and read it to us?

John: 2nd Nephi, 7:6. “I gave my back to the smiter, and my cheeks to them, that plucked off the hair.”

Darryl: Have you ever heard of hair being plucked off?

John: I don’t think it’s mentioned in the account, in the New Testament, that they pulled his hair out. But I know one of the commentaries, Hoyt Brewster says that was a way to humiliate or degrade someone, to pull their hair out.

Darryl: So, I know the Babylonian shaved them completely, shaved them bald, shaved their face. So, I wonder if… I mean, that’d be torturous to have a beard plucked out.

John: Yes, I don’t think they were careful either when they did it, and we’ll talk about that in 2nd Nephi chapter eight. But this idea of scabs, if someone shaves you and they don’t care about being careful, if you’re a prisoner, you’re going to have scabs.

Darryl: So much more torment there than I want to think about. You cited something in 2nd Nephi 7:9, there’s a footnote “A” that refers to Romans and the Joseph Smith translation. I want to be sure we bring that out because it meant something to me.

John: “It says the Lord is near, he justifieth me.” And it sounds like, this is the Messiah talking about the Father is with me, and it could also mean as we see in Isaiah, that the whole house of Israel, the Lord will be near them. But, yeah in Romans 8:31, the footnote here, which says, “if God before us, who can be against us,” and that’s a good point. God and one other person is a majority. You’ve probably heard that before. But the JST says, “if God before us who can prevail against us?”

Darryl: What a good word, prevail really…

John: Yes, kind of changes it, that we’ll have opposition, but they won’t prevail because God will be with us.

Darryl: So, in verse 9, there are two more symbols: wax and moths.

John: When I see wax in the scriptures, it always seems to be connected with growing. A lot of times in the Book of Mormon, they wax to stronger.

Darryl: That’s interesting because we talked about the moon waxing and waning, and that’s the only use in English that I was even familiar with before this.

John: Do you know what I always think of, which probably is incorrect? I always think of when you go to Nauvoo and they’re dipping the candles and showing you because each layer grows, and I think of the wax growing, which is probably not at all what they were talking about, but it just reminds me of that.

Darryl: For some reason, I was reading this today and thinking about waxing on and waxing off from the Karate Kid. But that’s not what it means. But you had something very clever here about the moth I thought was…

John: Oh, what did I say?

Darryl: Well, something about Purina, the Purina dog food company.

John: Purina moth chow, because moths are usually symbols of decay and destruction. So, where thieves can break through and steal, and moths corrupt, if you set your heart on material things, they all corrupt, they either rust, or fabric decays and moths get in it and stuff like that.

Darryl: So, you talked about this book with the symbol of Jesus knocking at the door and you did a nice summary with that. You talked about Matthew 7, through 8, and some assurance Isaiah gave us. Can you reflect on those?

John: Yeah, the idea of asking, I can’t remember, it might’ve been Boyd K Packer, that says…that command is given so often about asking. It’s so interesting, it never says don’t bother us up here, we’re busy, but it’s always just ask, just ask, just ask. Let’s see, where is Matthew verse is…

Darryl: It was the very end of the chapter.

John: Oh, of 2nd Nephi, 7.

John Bytheway Discovers 2 Nephi 7 and Isaiah 50 with Darryl
Jesus knocks, but we must open the door. (Jesus at the Door by Del Parson )

Darryl: It was in your very summary. So, Matthew, 7:7, it says, “Isaiah assures modern day Covenant Israel that God is constantly available, constantly willing to keep his promises,” but I didn’t look up the Matthew one.  It says, “Ask and it shall be given you, seek and you shall find, knock and it shall be opened unto you.” And you showed us that and it’s almost like a parallelism. Though Isaiah didn’t say that exactly, that’s what I was missing, and I just wanted to get that clarified. Isaiah was essentially saying the same thing.

John: Yes. God is there, he’s available, his arm is not shortened. His miracles were real, he’s reminding them of them and I just get that sense of, hey, I’ve always been here, type of a message in 2nd Nephi, 7.

Darryl: Well, I can tell you what, I’ll never think of this painting that Del Parson made of Jesus at the door the same way again, because I didn’t have a dad, or anyone else, until today, thank you, John Bytheway, for showing me there’s no knob on the door.

I’m the one who has to open the door if I want to let Christ in.

Thank you, appreciate you visiting with us today.

John: Great, I enjoyed it. Thanks.

The Suffering Servant: Part III

The Suffering Servant: Part II
Find other posts in this series by clicking here

In this, the third article of the series on the Suffering Servant, we can feel the weight of the our Redeemer’s sacrifice for us.

“He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief; and we hid as it were [our] faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.” —Isaiah 53:3

“Turning their faces from Him.” President Monson testified: “Who was this ‘man of sorrows, … acquainted with grief’? ‘Who is this King of glory, this Lord of lords? He is our Master. He is our Savior. He is the Son of God. He is the Author of Our Salvation. He beckons, ‘Follow me.’”[1]

Some follow the marginal note and suggest that it was Christ who hid His face from us. Urwick well argues the fallacy of such a view by quoting Isaiah 50:6b: “I hid not my face from shame and spitting.” Urwick reasons: “… the whole passage is describing not so much the Divine Servant’s conduct towards the people, as the people’s estimation of Him.”

Sister Carole M. Stephens shared: “Elder Richard G. Scott explained that ‘we were taught in the premortal world that our purpose in coming here is to be tested, tried, and stretched.’ That stretching comes in as many forms as there are individuals experiencing it. I’ve never had to live through divorce, the pain and insecurity that comes from abandonment, or the responsibility associated with being a single mother. I haven’t experienced the death of a child, infertility, or same-gender attraction. I haven’t had to endure abuse, chronic illness, or addiction. These have not been my stretching opportunities.

“So right now some of you are thinking, ‘Well then, Sister Stephens, you just don’t understand!’ And I answer that you may be right. I don’t completely understand your challenges. But through my personal tests and trials—the ones that have brought me to my knees—I have become well acquainted with the One who does understand, He who was ‘acquainted with grief,’ who experienced all and understands all. And in addition, I have experienced all of the mortal tests that I just mentioned through the lens of a daughter, mother, grandmother, sister, aunt, and friend.”[2]

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland taught: “… it is not without a recognition of life’s tempests but fully and directly because of them that I testify of God’s love and the Savior’s power to calm the storm. Always remember in that biblical story that He was out there on the water also, that He faced the worst of it right along with the newest and youngest and most fearful. Only one who has fought against those ominous waves is justified in telling us—as well as the sea—to ‘be still.’ Only one who has taken the full brunt of such adversity could ever be justified in telling us in such times to ‘be of good cheer.’

“Such counsel is not a jaunty pep talk about the power of positive thinking, though positive thinking is much needed in the world. No, Christ knows better than all others that the trials of life can be very deep and we are not shallow people if we struggle with them. But even as the Lord avoids sugary rhetoric, He rebukes faithlessness and He deplores pessimism. He expects us to believe! No one’s eyes were more penetrating than His, and much of what He saw pierced His heart. Surely His ears heard every cry of distress, every sound of want and despair. To a degree far more than we will ever understand, He was ‘a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief.’”[3]

“¶ Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.” Isaiah 53:4

Whitehouse renders this verse emphatically:

“Yet our diseases ‘twas he who bore,

And our sufferings, he bore their load;

While we, we thought him plague-struck,

Smitten of God and humiliated.”

“Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows.” Elder Neal A. Maxwell testified: “The cumulative weight of all mortal sins—past, present, and future—pressed upon that perfect, sinless, and sensitive Soul! All our infirmities and sicknesses were somehow, too, a part of the awful arithmetic of the Atonement.”[4]

Driver & Neubauer quote the Talmud: “The Messiah—what is his name? … The Rabbis … [say, The sick one], as it is said, ‘Surely he hath borne our sicknesses, etc.’ (Sanhedrin 98b).” Young explains that נָשָׂא here in essence has the meaning of “lifting up and carrying” (we shall see more on נָשָׂא when we speak of Isaiah 53:12).

Urwick explains: “The idea clearly is that one bearing as a burden the consequences of the sins of others, see Isaiah 53:11. The griefs and sorrows which He bore were our due, and belonged to us as the fruit and punishment of our sin.” Urwick also reminds us that the surely [אָכֵן] in this verse has the same type of certitude as the one we saw in Isaiah 40:7 were it is said that surely the people is grass [אָכֵן חָצִיר הָעָם]. (Remember that in Isaiah 40:7 the people were put in contrast to the Word of God, Christ.)

Elder Merrill J. Bateman has: “The prophet Abinadi further states that ‘when his soul has been made an offering for sin he shall see his seed.’ Abinadi then identifies the Savior’s seed as the prophets and those who follow them. For many years I thought of the Savior’s experience in the garden and on the cross as places where a large mass of sin was heaped upon Him.

“Through the words of Alma, Abinadi, Isaiah, and other prophets, however, my view has changed. Instead of an impersonal mass of sin, there was a long line of people, as Jesus felt ‘our infirmities’ ‘[bore] our griefs … carried our sorrows … [and] was bruised for our iniquities.’ The Atonement was an intimate, personal experience in which Jesus came to know how to help each of us.”[5]

Elder Erastus Snow taught: “The various pains and sorrows to be endured in life are all necessary in their time and place; the trials as we term them, are all necessary … they are all a part of the scheme of education or training to prepare us for the future. One of the sacred writers, in speaking of Jesus, said: ‘For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin’ (Hebrews 4:15).

“And again: ‘For God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him’ (John 3:34). It is measured out to you and me in the providence of the Lord; but for him there was a storehouse to draw upon, as it were, without measure. He could continue to heal the sick and raise the dead and perform great and marvelous things … he took upon himself our infirmities and bore our sickness, as had been predicted by Isaiah the prophet. He truly did heal the sick wherever he went.”[6]

Henderson, leaning on the Rabbinical Pesitkta says: “When the blessed Creator made his world, he stretched out his hand under the throne of glory, and brought out the soul of the Messiah. He then said to him: Wilt thou heal and redeem my sons after six thousand years? He replied: Yes. Then God said to him: Wilt thou bear the inflictions in order to purge their iniquity, as it is written: But it was our diseases he bore? He said to him: I will bear them joyfully.”[7]

Govett wrote: “The Evangelist Matthew quotes [this] verse in the following connection: ‘When the even was come, they brought unto him many that were possessed with devils: and he cast out the spirits with his word, and healed all that were sick: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses.’[8] From which we learn, that our blessed Lord’s curing of diseases was the fulfilment of this verse.”

Cowles underscores: “The word for ‘griefs’ means primarily, sicknesses, yet is put here for all ailments and evils.” And this makes sense, for we know that the Savior died not only for our sins, but also for our sorrows and pains: spiritual, physical and emotional.

“Yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.” Targum (????) has, “For we are considered crushed, smitten of the Lord and afflicted.” The Rabbis consider this regarding Messiah (Seder Nezikin, Sanhedrin 98b).

Driver & Neubauer quote Yepheth Ben ‘Ali: “By the words ‘surely he hath carried our sicknesses,’ they mean that the pains and sickness which he fell into were merited by them [i.e., by Israel], but that he bore them instead … And here I think it necessary to pause for a few moments, in order to explain why God caused these sicknesses to attach themselves to the Messiah for the sake of Israel.”

Birks wrote: “We, for whom He suffered, mistook the cause of His griefs, and reckoned Him as one who lay, for His own sake, under the just displeasure of God.” Rawlinson notes: “They who saw Christ suffer, instead of understanding that he was bearing the sins of others in a mediatorial capacity, imagined that he was suffering at God’s hands for his own sins. Hence they scoffed at him and reviled him, even in his greatest agonies (Matthew 27:39–44). To one only, and him not one of God’s people, was it given to see the contrary, and to declare aloud, at the moment of the death, ‘Certainly this was a righteous Man’ (Luke 23:47).”

“But he [was] wounded for our transgressions, [he was] bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement of our peace [was] upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.” Isaiah 53:5

“But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities.” The Lamsa Peshitta (????) has, “But he was slain for our sins, he was afflicted for our iniquities.” Driver & Neubauer quote Midrash Rabbah: “Another explanation (of Ruth 2:14):—He is speaking of the king Messiah: ‘Come hither,’ draw near to the throne; ‘and eat of the bread,’ that is, the bread of the kingdom; ‘and dip thy morsel in the vinegar,’ this refers to the chastisements, as it is said, ‘But he was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities’ (Ruth 4).”

From Yalqut, Driver & Neubauer quote “The chastisements are divided into three parts: one for David and the fathers, one for our own generation, and one for [the King Messiah; and this is that which is written, ‘He was wounded for our transgressions,’ etc. (Yalqut 2:620).

Urwick has: “The לָנוּ is again emphatic, and contrasts with the הוּא which begins the verse. Nothing can be stronger than the antithesis running through this verse, both between the pronouns he, him, his, on the one hand, and our, us, on the other; and that between the wounding, bruising, chastisement, stripes, on the one hand, and the peace and healing on the other” (emphasis added).

I had always thought that the Place of the Skull, or Golgotha, was a hill—one of my favorite hymns is “There is a green hill far away” (Hymns, 194). When Linda & I traveled to Israel, we had the opportunity to visit Gethsemane as well as the Garden Tomb. Near the tomb, there is a rock formation that looks like a skull (sadly, some of this had been defaced with some construction). The skull is clearly apparent. It has been suggested that Christ was crucified by a public thoroughfare—and not elevated much from the ground—so that those who passed by could spit, mock and insult Him in other ways.

Elder James E. Talmage spoke of our Savior’s anguish on the cross: “The spikes so cruelly driven through hands and feet penetrated and crushed sensitive nerves and quivering tendons, yet inflicted no mortal wound. The welcome relief of death came through the exhaustion caused by intense and unremitting pain, through localized inflammation and congestion of organs incident to the strained and unnatural posture of the body.”[9]

Frederick C. Grant tells us: “[At Golgotha] they stripped the three victims and nailed them to their crosses.”[10] Alfred Edersheim, after explaining the anguish that the Savior would experience by having the nails driven through His hands and feet, speaks about the anguish of crucifixion: “… the crucified hang for hours, even days, in the unutterable anguish, till consciousness at last failed. It was a merciful Jewish practice to give to those led to execution a draught of strong wine mixed with myrrh to as to deaden consciousness … That draught was offered to Jesus … but having tasted it, and ascertained its character and object, He would not drink it … He would meet Death  … by submitting to the full.”[11]

Cunningham Geikie speaks of the “hands and feet pierced by the nails … driven through parts where many sensitive nerves and sinews come together … Inflammation of the wounds in both hands and feet speedily set in … Intolerable thirst and ever-increasing pain resulted … The weight of the body itself, resting on the wooden pin of the upright beam … made each moment more terrible than the preceding. The numbness and stiffness of the more distant muscles brought on painful convulsions …”[12]

Frederic Farrar reminds us that: “The feet were but a little raised above the earth. The victim was in full reach of every hand that might choose to strike, in close proximity to every gesture of insult and hatred. He might hang for hours to be abused, insulted, even tortured by the ever-moving multitude who, with that desire to see what is horrible which always characterizes the coarsest hearts, had thronged to gaze upon a sight which should rather have made them weep … For indeed a death by crucifixion seems to include all that pain … all intensified just up to the point at which they can be endured at all, but all stopping just short of the point which would give the sufferer the relief of unconsciousness. The unnatural position made every moment painful …”[13]

“The chastisement of our peace was upon him.” Kimhi, in Neubauer & Driver has: “Others explain שלומנו in its ordinary meaning: ‘the chastisements which ought to have come upon us for our sins while we were at peace have fallen on him.’” And with his stripes we are healed. The LXX (????) reads, “By his bruises we are healed.” Instead of stripes, the Peshitta (????) has wounds. Similarly, the Douay-Rheims (????) has bruises instead of stripes.

Govett has: “The vicarious nature of the Redeemer’s suffering is next opened to our view. The prophet teaches the atoning nature of Christ’s death. His afflictions were not for any sin of his own, but for our transgressions, because he bare the penalty of them, that by his ‘stripes we might be healed.’ Because ‘we like sheep have gone astray, the Lord hath made to light on him the iniquities of us all:’ in which words the extent of his atonements is made equal to the extent of man’s sinfulness: or as the New Testament Scriptures phrase the same truth, ‘He is the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world.’”

Rawlinson has: “Besides the blows inflicted on him with the hand (Matthew 26:27) and with the reed (Matthew 27:30), our Lord was judicially scourged (Matthew 27:26). Such scourging would leave the ‘stripe-marks’ which are here spoken of.”

President Joseph Fielding Smith taught: “In my judgment the sacrament meeting is the most sacred, the most holy, of all the meetings of the Church. When I reflect upon the gathering of the Savior and his apostles on that memorable night when he introduced the sacrament, when I think of that solemn occasion, my heart is filled with wonderment and my feelings are touched. I consider that gathering one of the most solemn and wonderful since the beginning of time. There the Savior taught them of his coming sacrifice, which in their bewilderment they could not understand. He plainly told them of his death and that his blood should be shed, and this was said in the very hour of his agony for the sins of the world.

“It was a very solemn occasion; there the sacrament was instituted, and the disciples were commanded to meet together often and commemorate the death and sufferings … He was about to take upon him the responsibility of paying the debt brought upon the world through the fall, that men might be redeemed from death and from hell. He had taught the people that he was to be lifted up that he might draw all men unto him, and that all who would repent and believe in him, keeping his commandments, should not suffer for he would take upon himself their sins.

“For this purpose, we are called together once each week to partake of these emblems, witnessing that we do remember our Lord, that we are willing to take upon us his name, and that we will keep his commandments. This covenant we are called upon to renew each week, and we cannot retain the Spirit of the Lord if we do not consistently comply with this commandment. If we love the Lord, we will be present at these meetings in the spirit of worship and prayer, remembering the Lord and the covenant we are to renew each week through this sacrament as he has required it of us.”[14]

Notes

[1], Monson, President Thomas S., “The Divine Gift of Gratitude.” October 1987 General Conference.

[2] Stephens, Sister Carole M. “The Family Is of God,” April 2015 General Conference.

[3] Holland, Elder Jeffrey R., “An High Priest of Good Things to Come.” October 1999 General Conference.

[4] Maxwell, Elder Neal A. ‘Willing to Submit,’ Ensign (CR), May 1985, p.70.

[5] Bateman, Elder Merrill J., “A Pattern for All.” October 2005 General Conference.

[6] Snow, Elder Erastus, “Rest Signifies Change, Etc.” Journal of Discourses 21:25b. October 1879.

[7] See also Driver & Neubauer’s quote of P’siqtha (P’siqtha, Theologia Judaica, According to Sulsius, p. 328).

[8] See Matthew 8:16–17.

[9] Talmage, Elder James E. (1981). Jesus the Christ, p. 655.

[10] Grant, Frederick C. (1921). The Life and Times of Jesus, p. 212.

[11] Edersheim, Alfred (1886, 3rd New American Edition). The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, 2:589–590.

[12] Geikie, Cunningham (1896, Revised Edition). The Life and Words of Christ, 2:533.

[13] Farrar, Frederic W. (1874). The Life of Christ, 2:402–403.

[14] President Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation 2:340–341.

Isaiah Gospel Doctrine Teacher’s Guide 2018 A five part series helping instructors use the "Come, Follow Me" format

This post introduces the 2018 Gospel Doctrine Lesson Guide using the Come, Follow Me format, but for the adult Gospel Doctrine Sunday School classes operating in this Fall. The intent of the 2018 Gospel Doctrine Lesson Guide is to offer Sunday School teachers in the LDS Church additional resources to engage adults during Sunday School.

Below is a transcript of the above video with some supporting images:

Brothers and sisters, I’d like to welcome you today to Gospel Doctrine with Darryl. This is something a little bit new.

By way of background, so you can understand why I’m doing this, I am a Gospel Doctrine teacher currently in my own ward.  This is probably the third or fourth time I’ve taught the Old Testament, but having worked on “Discover with Darryl” at SearchIsaiah.org the last ten months, I feel like I have some insights to share, especially for Gospel doctrine instructors.  The first thing we’re going to do is show you two or three slides to give you a background into the “Come, follow me” format.

As stake Sunday school president, which was my previous calling for three years, I was in every classroom in the stake watching youth teachers use the “Come, follow me” curriculum. I fell in love with the format: small group discussions, scripture study during the week, reading talks, taking them apart, sharing dialogue and ideas.  It’s really kind of neat.

In this format, it’s important that you, as a teacher take the time to prepare yourself through study and through prayer.  You need to read the scriptures and related conference talks.  (There are not updated conference talks in the Old Testament: Gospel Doctrine Teacher’s Manual printed in 2001, so you will have to find them.  I’m going to show you how to do that in a minute.) And you also need to ponder and listen to what the Holy Ghost is suggesting to you for your class members.

One of the challenges I’m finding is that in our Gospel Doctrine class, we usually have thirty-five members. I try to get six discussion groups of five or six and that works ok.  In the regular “Come, follow me” format classroom, the groups are often two, three or four youth.  If you could get that same kind of ideal setting, you’ll probably get all the benefits of a “Come, follow me” discussion.

I’m told the thing about the “Come, follow me” curriculum is that (now I don’t know this, because I haven’t used “Preach my Gospel” in the mission field), people who have used it find the “Come, follow me” curriculum very natural.  If you have a return missionary who is serving as Gospel Doctrine teacher, or you are one, you’ll find this format to be really, very simple.

What I’d like to recommend to you right now, is that you take a moment and download the course outlines.  It will look a lot like the youth curriculum. There will be some suggested talks in scripture study for you. Then it’ll follow the Gospel Doctrine lesson manual with some discussion ideas.

At this point, it would be wise for you to watch the video, Teaching the Gospel in the Saviors Way.  This is a four-and-a-half-minute video from the Church.  It helps you understand the youth curriculum and we’ll play it for you right now, or you can go out later and study it.


But be sure you watch this video, so you have a background if you don’t know the “Come, follow me” format.  Also, at the Church’s youth website, “Come, follow me” there are some important teaching tools that give you a chance to explore the “Come, follow me” curriculum. 

Here you can see the first presidencies announcement, read articles about the curriculum, and read frequently asked questions. These things will really help you get this format under your belt.  Now, we’re going to move from this introduction into an actual lesson (if you click here we will take you to lesson 35 where you will receive a lesson plan in the Come, Follow Me format and a slide deck to use with this lesson).